respect.
.. Often, when a talk to a vegan mangiacadaveri, jump off the infamous phrase "I respect your choice you respect mine. " This statement has a logical loophole so big and obvious that hard to believe that the person can really believe that the pronunciation. Yet, it seems so.
Why is not logical to say that the mangiacadaveri respect our choice? Simple, because it is not true in practice, as they can argue to the contrary. What is it based on respect?
"The respect is not respect, deference, reverence. E 'attention, consideration and about to persons, institutions and things. "
consideration. About.
How can a being that eats other living things to say to a person who claims the lives of those same animals that respect? Obviously, he respects perhaps in words but in deeds mangiacadaveri the lack of respect for the vegan in the most sinister there is. Or
mangiacadaveri think that telling a vegan "I respect your choice" means to respect the fact that the vegan you eat vegetables? No, because to me it seems absolutely ridiculous to me that one is to say, in a nutshell, "Compliance the fact that you eat a carrot. " Well, God forbid, but, wow.
seems to me the obvious illogic of the situation:-The
mangiacadaveri becomes complicit in the death of the animals. The vegan-
rejects the death of the animals.
How can mangiacadaveri say that complies with the vegan? With that courage, then?
frasettina This is the result of a stunted and careless ostentation of the "politically correct" label and running false and dangerous.
So mangiacadaveri, you have little to offend when you call with certain names. If
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Biology Lab 5 Answers
.. if you're in Brighton on March 21 ..
.. you are in Brighton on March 21, do not forget to pay a visit to VEGAN Fayre 2009! I do not know this show of veganism: it is learned from the site of Sea Shepherd, as some representatives of the association will be present. From official site reveals that there will be several groups to spread veganism, as well as many information stands and especially culinary (GNAM) ... So, if you are in your area is an event not to be missed!
.. you are in Brighton on March 21, do not forget to pay a visit to VEGAN Fayre 2009! I do not know this show of veganism: it is learned from the site of Sea Shepherd, as some representatives of the association will be present. From official site reveals that there will be several groups to spread veganism, as well as many information stands and especially culinary (GNAM) ... So, if you are in your area is an event not to be missed!
Star Wars Waffle Iron
.. tell me that I should not insult those of Greenpeace.
.. I just finished reading a wonderful editorial Captain Paul Watson, when I decided to leave for a trip to the supermarket near his home to buy a few things for dinner. Here I find myself face to face with the now ubiquitous raccoglifirme Greenpeace, complete with a bar, a giant skeleton of a whale boat. There they were, with their pens, intent on picking up unsuspecting new members (most of all, lots of good money ) on behalf of new and innovative campaign against illegal Japanese whaling in the Arctic Sea. Oh, Look at that timing! - I thought. The whaling season ended just ten days ago, with the return of the ship Nisshin Maru and Yushin Maru in Japan. And now Greenpeace is launching a new campaign against whaling, after more than 500 whales have been brutally killed in the Arctic seas.
Great!
addition, this year in the area known as "Whale Sanctuary" (ie, protected place where, according to the IWC, whales should be allowed to live quietly and do not come from the Japanese Hookshot) vessels equipped with super Greenpeace, with its rafts and colored posters (worthy of the best nursery), were not present. The only ship spot actively to defend the whales was the Farley Mowat of Sea Shepherd, which has tracked for more than two months, and chased the whalers nipponiche hindered. Successfully.
I should also mention that last year Greenpeace organized a massive fund-raising throughout the world, through which some of you will earn a large nutshell, promising a concrete intervention in Antarctic waters. In mid-November, however, then campaign ended, a statement from Greenpeace announced that no ship would have gone in the icy seas of the south, leaving those "eco-terrorism , dangerous extremists Sea Shepherd" (sic) alone and at the mercy of killers determined to make a profit on the skin of whales.
Great!
But let us. With this background, one can clearly imagine how much I want to speak with anyone who had to do with this "Large" group. Unfortunately, Murphy's law partner, of all the passers-by the man with the pen has just stopped me. Man, on the other, dressed in Prada shoe leather and fur neck (probably dog). Despite my clear eyes, the man begins:
" Hello! Greenpeace already know? It is the largest association for the protection of eco ... "
No, I tell myself. The stationary. I do not want to quarrel.
" No look, I am ... or in favor of Sea Shepherd is not really the case .. "
I stop
" Sea that ...? "
Perhaps I have spoken evil, I gather, since I do not like to pronounce foreign words correctly to avoid appearing arrogant.
" Sea Shepherd! "
She looks at me with confused look and says,
" Ah boh do not know, but Greenpeace .. "
sbonk! Void ... in my mind the thought is hard to engage. This guy talks to me about Greenpeace, but has no idea what Sea Shepherd? Is it possible? Occurred:
" But how ... work for Greenpeace and you've never heard of Sea Shepherd? "
him, offended
" Well interchange is an agency that put me here ... not my fault "
Ok then ... apart from the fact that legally "did not know - it's not my fault" is not completely covered, you're talking about the "greening of the planet's largest association" (of the Series: Greenpeace is never self-congratulatory), but in fact you do not have the faintest idea what to do or who they are? I Are you kidding? "I could not stop myself:
" Well then informed that it is better. Goodbye "
I left under his eyes very, very offended. What I
perplime that Greenpeace is really sends out people who do not have the slightest idea what he's doing just to raise money and unsuspecting supporters. The man with the pen reads a script memorized, intortando anyone who is not versed in the mud of what this organization does and did. Such as fish for astromerluzzo (endangered species) while in the Antarctic Whale Sanctuary. Such as to divert attention to whaling this year by presenting a report on the internal contradictions unlikely to trade in whale meat.
What can I say? Great. From Greenpeace
I do not expect anything different, however. But what absolutely can not stand is that a little man with the pen to be any talk of a "major environmental group" dressed corpses, with the clear and unique purpose to earn some money even using the excuse of good Because .... gaining, then, on the skin of my brothers. I am willing to have constructive dialogue with people who do not or at least have knowledge of the facts, who can what they do, they have weird ideas concerning Captain Watson who at least know what I'm talking about. If one is convinced that both Greenpeace and Sea Shepherd good and evil incarnate, at least I can discuss, even argue, and I have a minimal chance to change his mind. If you do not change, however, will not have my respect, but at least I tried. But one whose only concern is the vile money will never, ever have my respect.
.. I just finished reading a wonderful editorial Captain Paul Watson, when I decided to leave for a trip to the supermarket near his home to buy a few things for dinner. Here I find myself face to face with the now ubiquitous raccoglifirme Greenpeace, complete with a bar, a giant skeleton of a whale boat. There they were, with their pens, intent on picking up unsuspecting new members (most of all, lots of good money ) on behalf of new and innovative campaign against illegal Japanese whaling in the Arctic Sea. Oh, Look at that timing! - I thought. The whaling season ended just ten days ago, with the return of the ship Nisshin Maru and Yushin Maru in Japan. And now Greenpeace is launching a new campaign against whaling, after more than 500 whales have been brutally killed in the Arctic seas.
Great!
addition, this year in the area known as "Whale Sanctuary" (ie, protected place where, according to the IWC, whales should be allowed to live quietly and do not come from the Japanese Hookshot) vessels equipped with super Greenpeace, with its rafts and colored posters (worthy of the best nursery), were not present. The only ship spot actively to defend the whales was the Farley Mowat of Sea Shepherd, which has tracked for more than two months, and chased the whalers nipponiche hindered. Successfully.
I should also mention that last year Greenpeace organized a massive fund-raising throughout the world, through which some of you will earn a large nutshell, promising a concrete intervention in Antarctic waters. In mid-November, however, then campaign ended, a statement from Greenpeace announced that no ship would have gone in the icy seas of the south, leaving those "eco-terrorism , dangerous extremists Sea Shepherd" (sic) alone and at the mercy of killers determined to make a profit on the skin of whales.
Great!
But let us. With this background, one can clearly imagine how much I want to speak with anyone who had to do with this "Large" group. Unfortunately, Murphy's law partner, of all the passers-by the man with the pen has just stopped me. Man, on the other, dressed in Prada shoe leather and fur neck (probably dog). Despite my clear eyes, the man begins:
" Hello! Greenpeace already know? It is the largest association for the protection of eco ... "
No, I tell myself. The stationary. I do not want to quarrel.
" No look, I am ... or in favor of Sea Shepherd is not really the case .. "
I stop
" Sea that ...? "
Perhaps I have spoken evil, I gather, since I do not like to pronounce foreign words correctly to avoid appearing arrogant.
" Sea Shepherd! "
She looks at me with confused look and says,
" Ah boh do not know, but Greenpeace .. "
sbonk! Void ... in my mind the thought is hard to engage. This guy talks to me about Greenpeace, but has no idea what Sea Shepherd? Is it possible? Occurred:
" But how ... work for Greenpeace and you've never heard of Sea Shepherd? "
him, offended
" Well interchange is an agency that put me here ... not my fault "
Ok then ... apart from the fact that legally "did not know - it's not my fault" is not completely covered, you're talking about the "greening of the planet's largest association" (of the Series: Greenpeace is never self-congratulatory), but in fact you do not have the faintest idea what to do or who they are? I Are you kidding? "I could not stop myself:
" Well then informed that it is better. Goodbye "
I left under his eyes very, very offended. What I
perplime that Greenpeace is really sends out people who do not have the slightest idea what he's doing just to raise money and unsuspecting supporters. The man with the pen reads a script memorized, intortando anyone who is not versed in the mud of what this organization does and did. Such as fish for astromerluzzo (endangered species) while in the Antarctic Whale Sanctuary. Such as to divert attention to whaling this year by presenting a report on the internal contradictions unlikely to trade in whale meat.
What can I say? Great. From Greenpeace
I do not expect anything different, however. But what absolutely can not stand is that a little man with the pen to be any talk of a "major environmental group" dressed corpses, with the clear and unique purpose to earn some money even using the excuse of good Because .... gaining, then, on the skin of my brothers. I am willing to have constructive dialogue with people who do not or at least have knowledge of the facts, who can what they do, they have weird ideas concerning Captain Watson who at least know what I'm talking about. If one is convinced that both Greenpeace and Sea Shepherd good and evil incarnate, at least I can discuss, even argue, and I have a minimal chance to change his mind. If you do not change, however, will not have my respect, but at least I tried. But one whose only concern is the vile money will never, ever have my respect.
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Shore Job For Master Mariner
.. a curious thing. But sobering. Tasmania
.. I was searching for a word on my English vocabulary when, quite by chance, I came across in definition of the word " Butchery" (" slaughter").
He says the 'Oxford dictionary:
Butch-ery : noun , a cruel, violent and Unnecessary killing 2 Preparing the work of meat to be sold
I find it very interesting that the first meaning (not the second, first) is that of "killing cruel, violent and useless" and not commonly known to us which covers the preparation of meat. It is also interesting how the two meanings are curiously joined, bringing a quasi-logical deduction: first we are told that the slaughter is cruel, violent and useless, then we are told that it is also the action that concerns the preparation of the meat which is then sold to be eaten. Conclusion (logic, at this point): the meat you eat comes from an act cruel, violent and useless. Not bat an eyelid, right?
So, folks, think twice before eating your steak. I do not think I need to say more .... Go Vegan!
.. I was searching for a word on my English vocabulary when, quite by chance, I came across in definition of the word " Butchery" (" slaughter").
He says the 'Oxford dictionary:
Butch-ery : noun , a cruel, violent and Unnecessary killing 2 Preparing the work of meat to be sold
I find it very interesting that the first meaning (not the second, first) is that of "killing cruel, violent and useless" and not commonly known to us which covers the preparation of meat. It is also interesting how the two meanings are curiously joined, bringing a quasi-logical deduction: first we are told that the slaughter is cruel, violent and useless, then we are told that it is also the action that concerns the preparation of the meat which is then sold to be eaten. Conclusion (logic, at this point): the meat you eat comes from an act cruel, violent and useless. Not bat an eyelid, right?
So, folks, think twice before eating your steak. I do not think I need to say more .... Go Vegan!
What Respirates Faster A Mammal Or A Reptile
..: 200 stranded cetaceans.
.. Sunday afternoon, nearly 200 whales are stranded on the beach of King Island in Tasmania . Among the cetaceans recognized as pilot whales (pilot whales), there were 7 also bottle-nosed dolphins . Five of them were immediately rescued by rangers and volunteers, 130 pilot whales but unfortunately there was nothing to be done: they have lost their lives in immense suffering a few hours. Rescuers managed to save only 54 animals in total.
Some activists of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, returning from the Ross Sea after a long campaign Musashi (game last December to oppose illegal Japanese whaling in the Antarctic sea), went there to give help and save the whales. A detailed guide in English here
Over the past three months, four similar cases in the same area saw more than 400 whales die beached , especially pilot whales and sperm whales. This is in fact the migration season for these animals, which go in large flocks near the coast of Tasmania and Australia.
It is believed that the stranding of cetaceans is to be charged, as usual, human activity in the open sea: sonar and ultrasound disturb the sensitive method of orientation of whales, confusing them and making them impossible to follow their usual route. For many years that such tragedies occur, but nothing was done to reduce or, better still, eliminate the problem.
If we join the victims of those strandings of illegal Japanese whaling, to add the thousands of animals died as a result to trawl and longlines with (many cetaceans remain imprisoned and die drowned) and the animals captured and brutally slaughtered for the Asian market, we recognize the emergency situation in which our ocean are. And that is getting worse day by day.
Cetacean disoriented, caught, trapped, killed. Ecosystems destroyed. Polluted waters.
All this is due exclusively to human activity. To which the human However, there seems to be paying any attention.
.. Sunday afternoon, nearly 200 whales are stranded on the beach of King Island in Tasmania . Among the cetaceans recognized as pilot whales (pilot whales), there were 7 also bottle-nosed dolphins . Five of them were immediately rescued by rangers and volunteers, 130 pilot whales but unfortunately there was nothing to be done: they have lost their lives in immense suffering a few hours. Rescuers managed to save only 54 animals in total.
Some activists of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, returning from the Ross Sea after a long campaign Musashi (game last December to oppose illegal Japanese whaling in the Antarctic sea), went there to give help and save the whales. A detailed guide in English here
Over the past three months, four similar cases in the same area saw more than 400 whales die beached , especially pilot whales and sperm whales. This is in fact the migration season for these animals, which go in large flocks near the coast of Tasmania and Australia.
It is believed that the stranding of cetaceans is to be charged, as usual, human activity in the open sea: sonar and ultrasound disturb the sensitive method of orientation of whales, confusing them and making them impossible to follow their usual route. For many years that such tragedies occur, but nothing was done to reduce or, better still, eliminate the problem.
If we join the victims of those strandings of illegal Japanese whaling, to add the thousands of animals died as a result to trawl and longlines with (many cetaceans remain imprisoned and die drowned) and the animals captured and brutally slaughtered for the Asian market, we recognize the emergency situation in which our ocean are. And that is getting worse day by day.
Cetacean disoriented, caught, trapped, killed. Ecosystems destroyed. Polluted waters.
All this is due exclusively to human activity. To which the human However, there seems to be paying any attention.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)